OSS Signal Maintainer Plan
Repository: https://github.com/Grovanni/oss-signal
Source: GitHub (Grovanni/oss-signal@main)
Generated: 2026-06-04T23:21:19.923Z
Current score: 71/100 (C)
Recommended PR Sequence
1. Continuous integration
- Impact: high (12 pts)
- Suggested file:
.github/workflows/ci.yml
- Why: CI catches regressions before maintainers merge changes.
- Change: Add a GitHub Actions workflow that runs linting and tests on pushes and pull requests.
Acceptance:
- The repository has a clear continuous integration signal.
- The change is documented or intentionally marked as not applicable.
oss-signal no longer reports this check as missing.
2. Code of conduct
- Impact: medium (6 pts)
- Suggested file:
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
- Why: Community norms reduce ambiguity during difficult interactions.
- Change: Add CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, for example the Contributor Covenant.
Acceptance:
- The repository has a clear code of conduct signal.
- The change is documented or intentionally marked as not applicable.
oss-signal no longer reports this check as missing.
3. Dependency update automation
- Impact: medium (5 pts)
- Suggested file:
.github/dependabot.yml
- Why: Automated dependency updates reduce security and compatibility drift.
- Change: Add .github/dependabot.yml for the package ecosystems used in the repository.
Acceptance:
- The repository has a clear dependency update automation signal.
- The change is documented or intentionally marked as not applicable.
oss-signal no longer reports this check as missing.
4. Support policy
- Impact: low (4 pts)
- Suggested file:
SUPPORT.md
- Why: Support boundaries help maintainers avoid turning every request into unpaid consulting.
- Change: Add SUPPORT.md describing where to ask questions, what is in scope, and expected response times.
Acceptance:
- The repository has a clear support policy signal.
- The change is documented or intentionally marked as not applicable.
oss-signal no longer reports this check as missing.
5. Static security analysis
- Impact: low (4 pts)
- Suggested file:
.github/workflows/codeql.yml
- Why: Static analysis finds common vulnerability patterns before releases.
- Change: Add a CodeQL or equivalent security scanning workflow.
Acceptance:
- The repository has a clear static security analysis signal.
- The change is documented or intentionally marked as not applicable.
oss-signal no longer reports this check as missing.
Maintainer Notes
- Keep each item as a small documentation or automation PR unless the maintainer asks for a broader cleanup.
- Do not ask for stars, follows, or reciprocal pull requests.
- If a check is intentionally absent, document the decision instead of forcing the file.